The microbiological quality of draught no- and low-alcohol beers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58430/jib.v132i1.89Keywords:
alcohol-free, low-alcohol, NoLo, NABLAB, draught beer, dispense, microbial spoilage, forcing testAbstract
Why was the work done: To determine the microbiological quality of draught no- and low-alcohol beers in the on-trade and to provide insight into the factors that may influence susceptibility to spoilage.
How was the work done: 53 samples comprising of 17 brands, seven different beer styles (lager, India pale ale, pale ale, wheat, radler, pilsner and amber ale), were sampled at least twice in 12 different public houses in Nottingham, UK. Spoilage potential was determined using a forcing test with beers incubated statically at 30°C for 96 hours. Quality was assessed – using four categories - based on the relative increase in absorbance at 660 nm, reflecting the growth of beer spoilage microorganisms present in the beer at dispense. The physiochemical properties of each beer (ethanol, present gravity, pH) were evaluated pre- and post-forcing.
What are the main findings: 54.7% of the draught beers sampled were of ‘unacceptable’ quality due to microbial growth. Additionally, the concentration of ethanol was elevated, with some samples exceeding the limit for no- and low-alcohol beers in the UK. Principal Component Analysis showed that samples ranked as ‘unacceptable’ were positively correlated with a high present gravity and high pH. However, the susceptibility of no- and low-alcohol beers to spoilage is also determined by interacting intrinsic factors (lack of ethanol and carbohydrate profile) and extrinsic influences (hygiene of dispense equipment together with the rate of beer throughput).
Why is the work important: The reduction or elimination of ethanol (an antimicrobial hurdle) in the production of no- and low-alcohol beers results in a product that is more susceptible to spoilage by microorganisms. To ensure product quality and food safety, it is recommended that no- and low-alcohol beers should have a pH < 4.0, contain minimal residual sugar content, and undergo appropriate stabilisation procedures prior to packaging. The production of ethanol by dispense microorganisms presents an additional risk to the no- and low-alcohol category. This should be considered by brewers to ensure that this does not become a compliance issue. Further, particular care should be taken in the hygienic handling of no and low products, with implementation of robust and regular cleaning regimes for conventional long line dispense systems.
Downloads
References
Bellut K, Arendt EK. 2019. Chance and challenge: non-Saccharomyces yeasts in nonalcoholic and low alcohol beer brewing - A Review. J Am Soc Brew Chem 77:77-91.
Brányik T, Silva DP, Baszczyňski M, Lehnert R, Almeida E Silva JB. 2012. A review of methods of low alcohol and alcohol-free beer production. J Food Eng 108:493-506.
Britton SJ, Hill AE. 2025. Microbiological quality control in non- and low-alcoholic beer manufacturing: a comprehensive review of microbial contaminants and strategies for spoilage prevention. J Am Soc Brew Chem 1-18.
Casson D. 1985. Microbiological problems of beer dispense. The Brewer 71:417-421.
De Roos J, De Vuyst L. 2019. Microbial acidification, alcoholization, and aroma production during spontaneous lambic beer production. J Sci Food Agric 99:25-38.
Gov.UK 2018. Low alcohol descriptors.
Harper D. 1981. A microbiologist looks at beer dispense. Brewers' Guardian 31:23-28.
Harper D, Hough J, Young T. 1980. Microbiology of beer dispensing systems. Brewers’ Guardian 109:24-28.
Hemmons LM. 1954. Wild yeasts in draught beer. An exploratory survey. J Inst Brew 60:288-291.
Hough J, Young T, Braund A, Longstaff D, Weeks R, White M. 1976. Keg and cellar tank beer in public houses–a microbiological study. The Brewer 62:179-183.
Ingledew WM. 1979. Effect of bacterial contamination on beer. A review. J Am Soc Brew Chem 37:145-150.
Jevons AL, Quain DE. 2022. Identification of spoilage microflora in draught beer using culture‐ dependent methods. J Appl Microbiol 133:3728-3740.
Kurniawan YN, Shinohara Y, Takesue N, Sakai H, Magarifuchi T, Suzuki K. 2021. Development of a rapid and accurate nanopore-based sequencing platform for on-field identification of beer-spoilage bacteria in the breweries. J Am Soc Brew Chem 79:240-248.
Lund PA, De Biase D, Liran O, Scheler O, Mira NP, Cetecioglu Z, Fernández EN, Bover-Cid S, Hall R, Sauer M, O’byrne C. 2020. Understanding how microorganisms respond to acid pH is central to their control and successful exploitation. Front Microbiol 11:556140.
Mallett JR, Quain DE. 2019. Draught beer hygiene: a survey of on‐trade quality. J Inst Brew 125:261-267.
Mallett JR, Stuart MS, Quain DE. 2018. Draught beer hygiene: a forcing test to assess quality. J Inst Brew 124:31-37.
Menz G, Aldred P, Vriesekoop F. 2011. Growth and survival of foodborne pathogens in beer. J Food Prot 74:1670-1675.
Menz G, Andrighetto C, Lombardi A, Corich V, Aldred P, Vriesekoop F. 2010. Isolation, identification, and characterisation of beer-spoilage lactic acid bacteria from microbrewed beer from Victoria, Australia. J Inst Brew 116:14-22.
Okaru AO, Lachenmeier DW. 2022. Defining no and low (NoLo) alcohol products. Nutrients 14(18):3873.
Quain DE. 2021. The enhanced susceptibility of alcohol‐free and low alcohol beers to microbiological spoilage: implications for draught dispense. J Inst Brew 127:406-416.
Quain DE, Jevons AL. 2023. The spoilage of lager by draught beer microbiota. J Inst Brew 129:307-320.
Quain DE. 2025. Draught beer: hygiene, microbiology and quality, 281-307. In Hill AE (ed) Brewing Microbiology: Managing Microbes, Ensuring Quality and Valorising Waste, Woodhead Publishing.
Rachon G, Rothera H, O'Reilly S, Betts G. 2024. Survival of Escherichia coli O157, Salmonella Enteritidis, Bacillus cereus and Clostridium botulinum in non-alcoholic beers. J Inst Brew 130:250-263.
Rainbow C. 1981. Beer spoilage microorganisms. In Pollock JRA (ed), Brewing Science, volume 2, Academic Press, London, UK.
Roselli GE, Kerruish DWM, Crow M, Smart KA, Powell CD. 2024. The two faces of microorganisms in traditional brewing and the implications for no- and low-alcohol beers. Front Microbiol 15:1346724.
Sakamoto K, Konings WN. 2003. Beer spoilage bacteria and hop resistance. Int J Food Microbiol 89:105-124.
Toivola A, Varjú P, Torrent J. 2005 Determination of alcohol in low alcohol and non alcohol beers by gas chromatography-FID, near infra red spectroscopy and catalytic combustion methods. J Inst Brew 112:241-244.
Vriesekoop F, Krahl M, Hucker B, Menz G. 2012. 125th anniversary review: bacteria in brewing: the good, the bad and the ugly. J Inst Brew 118:335-345.
Wiles A. 1950. Studies of some yeasts causing spoilage of draught beers. J Inst Brew 56:183-193.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 06-03-2026 (2)
- 26-02-2026 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of the Institute of Brewing

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed or built upon in any way.
Permission will be required if the proposed reuse is not covered by the terms of the License. In this event, email the Editor in Chief - david.quain@cibd.org.uk - with details of your request.