Journal of the Institute of Brewing https://jib.cibd.org.uk/index.php/jib <p>This is the 132<sup>nd</sup> year of publication of the<em> Journal of the Institute of Brewing</em>. The journal publishes original papers and reviews on the science and technology of malting, brewing, fermentation, quality and distilling/maturation. As of 2023, the Journal is <strong>open access, without any fees or page charges.</strong></p> <p>Issues of the Journal from 2023 can be found in the '<a href="https://jib.cibd.org.uk/index.php/jib/issue/archive">Archives</a>' (above). Issues published between 1895-2022 are <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/20500416">here</a>.</p> <p>The scope of the Journal includes studies on beer, wine and spirits made from 'grasses' (the <em class="eujQNb" data-processed="true">Poaceae</em> family includes cereals and sugarcane). Manuscripts (MS) on cider may also be submitted as they have been since 1911. Whilst manuscripts on fruit beers are in scope, fruit-based wines and spirits are outside the scope of the Journal. </p> <p>Authors should scrupulously apply the <a href="https://www.ibd.org.uk/resources/ibd-publications/journal-of-the-institute-of-brewing/jib-contribute/">'instructions to authors</a>' to their MS. Submission is via <a href="https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jib">ScholarOne.</a> Manuscripts that ignore the instructions to authors will be rejected.</p> <p>Submissions are initially assessed by the EiC to determine suitability for consideration of publication in the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by (typically) two anonymous reviewers who are experts in the appropriate field.</p> The Chartered Institute of Brewers and Distillers en-US Journal of the Institute of Brewing 2050-0416 <p class="p1">This is an open access article which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed or built upon in any way.</p> <p class="p1"><strong>Permission will be required if the proposed reuse is not covered by the terms of the License.</strong> In this event, email the Editor in Chief - david.quain@cibd.org.uk - with details of your request.</p> <p class="p1"> </p> Reflections https://jib.cibd.org.uk/index.php/jib/article/view/96 <p class="p1">This issue of <span class="s1"><em>Reflections</em></span> celebrates the contribution to the <span class="s1"><em>Journal of the Institute of Brewing</em></span> of Professor Emeritus Graham Stewart who died in May aged 84. His academic and applied studies on brewing yeast and fermentation at Labatt’s in Canada (1969-1994) and at International Centre for Brewing and Distilling (ICBD) Heriot-Watt University in Scotland (1994-2007) resulted in significant insights and associated process developments with innumerable publications in journals, industry magazines together with books both - in his own right - and as co-editor. Between 1973 and 2013, he published 49 papers in the <span class="s1"><em>Journal of the Institute of Brewing</em></span> and, in appreciation, his ‘top 10’ papers by citation are listed here. It is particularly fitting that two of the four papers in this issue of the JIB are from the ICBD.</p> David Quain Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of the Institute of Brewing https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2026-07-02 2026-07-02 132 2 60 61 10.58430/jib.v132i2.96 Unravelling the art of feints recycling for whisky: a production survey https://jib.cibd.org.uk/index.php/jib/article/view/99 <p class="p2"><span class="s2"><strong>Why the work was done: </strong></span>Batch distillation is used globally to produce a number of different categories of spirit using a variety of methodologies. This work aims to gain a better understanding of the current institutional knowledge on batch distillation techniques for the various categories of whisky, including the recycling and processing of 'final runnings' or the 'tails' fraction.</p> <p class="p2"><span class="s2"><strong>How the work was done: </strong></span>A survey was designed to gain insight into current distilling knowledge and practice. Sixty distillers from eight countries respnded to the survey and reported their distillation practices with particular emphasis on how decisions are made regarding where the individual liquid fractions begin and end during distillation and how the feints ('heads' + tails') are subsequently handled.</p> <p class="p2"><span class="s2"><strong>What are the main findings: </strong></span>Of the 60 distillers surveyed, 59 responded that they recycled feints in some way and 93.2% of those respondents noted that the feints did appear to stabilise after a few distillation cycles. The majority (75%) noted that there is a cost benefit to recycling feints and 61.7% also felt that feints recycling improved the character of the overall spirit.</p> <p class="p3"><span class="s2"><strong>Why is the work important: </strong></span>Despite the prevalence of recycling feints, little is understood about how this process affects spirit character or why the phenomenon of stabilisation occurs. This and further research, will provide distillers with better insight into their practices and offer tools for continued improvement in spirit quality.</p> Matt Strickland Dawn Maskell Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of the Institute of Brewing https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2026-06-29 2026-06-29 132 2 xx xx 10.58430/jib.v132i2.99 Quantifying the impact of increasing wash strength for Scotch malt whisky production: a modelling study https://jib.cibd.org.uk/index.php/jib/article/view/97 <p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>Why was the work done:</strong></span> High gravity fermentation (<span class="s2"><em>ca</em></span> 8% ABV) is used in the production of Scotch malt whisky but the impact of increasing wash strength on fermentation and distilling has not been quantified, especially in relation to environmental and operational performance.</p> <p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>How was the work done:</strong></span> A representative scenario of a 200 hL wash at 8% ABV was used to model wash strengths of 10-14% ABV under two conditions: the same wash volume (<span class="s2"><em>Condition 1</em></span>) and the same ethanol mass (<span class="s2"><em>Condition 2</em></span>). All scenarios were assessed quantitatively.</p> <p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>What are the main findings</strong></span>: In <span class="s2"><em>Condition 1</em></span>, increasing wash strength enhanced batch production capacity but may require a larger spirit still or multiple distillation batches. In <span class="s2"><em>Condition 2</em></span>, higher wash strength reduced batch processing volumes, enabling the use of smaller vessels without compromising the capacity for ethanol production. Distilling energy dominated the total energy demand, whereas fermenter cooling energy was negligible. On the basis of a litre of pure alcohol (100% ABV) and an annual target basis, increasing wash strength from 8 to 14% ABV progressively reduced energy use and carbon footprint by 15.8-16.1%, while also reducing post-distillation discharge volumes by 55.0% in pot ale and 30.4% in spent lees.</p> <p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>Why is the work important:</strong></span> This study provides quantitative evidence of the effects of increasing wash strength (8-14% ABV) on the operational and environmental performance in Scotch malt whisky production. This supports process innovation, capacity planning, and industrial decarbonisation strategies.</p> Shiwen Zhuang Jane White Chris Boulton Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of the Institute of Brewing https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 2026-06-11 2026-06-11 132 2 xx xx 10.58430/jib.v132i2.97