https://jib.cibd.org.uk/index.php/jib/issue/feedJournal of the Institute of Brewing2026-07-21T16:36:59+00:00Dr David Quaindavid.quain@cibd.org.ukOpen Journal Systems<p>This is the 132<sup>nd</sup> year of publication of the<em> Journal of the Institute of Brewing</em>. The journal publishes original papers and reviews on the science and technology of malting, brewing, fermentation, quality and distilling/maturation. As of 2023, the Journal is <strong>open access, without any fees or page charges </strong>aka<strong> 'diamond open access'.</strong></p> <p>Issues of the Journal from 2023 can be found in the '<a href="https://jib.cibd.org.uk/index.php/jib/issue/archive">Archives</a>' (above). Issues published between 1895-2022 are <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/20500416">here</a>.</p> <p>The scope of the Journal includes studies on beer, wine and spirits made from 'grasses' (the <em class="eujQNb" data-processed="true">Poaceae</em> family includes cereals and sugarcane). Manuscripts (MS) on cider may also be submitted as they have been since 1911. Whilst manuscripts on fruit beers are in scope, fruit-based wines and spirits are outside the scope of the Journal. </p> <p>Authors should scrupulously apply the <a href="https://www.ibd.org.uk/resources/ibd-publications/journal-of-the-institute-of-brewing/jib-contribute/">'instructions to authors</a>' to their MS. Submission is via <a href="https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jib">ScholarOne.</a> Manuscripts that ignore the instructions to authors will be rejected.</p> <p>Submissions are initially assessed by the EiC to determine suitability for consideration of publication in the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by (typically) two anonymous reviewers who are experts in the appropriate field.</p>https://jib.cibd.org.uk/index.php/jib/article/view/96Reflections2026-05-04T12:38:16+00:00David Quaindavid.quain@cibd.org.uk<p class="p1">This issue of <span class="s1"><em>Reflections</em></span> celebrates the contribution to the <span class="s1"><em>Journal of the Institute of Brewing</em></span> of Professor Emeritus Graham Stewart who died in May aged 84. His academic and applied studies on brewing yeast and fermentation at Labatt’s in Canada (1969-1994) and at International Centre for Brewing and Distilling (ICBD) Heriot-Watt University in Scotland (1994-2007) resulted in significant insights and associated process developments with innumerable publications in journals, industry magazines together with books both - in his own right - and as co-editor. Between 1973 and 2013, he published 49 papers in the <span class="s1"><em>Journal of the Institute of Brewing</em></span> and, in appreciation, his ‘top 10’ papers by citation are listed here. It is particularly fitting that two of the four papers in this issue of the JIB are from the ICBD.</p>2026-07-02T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of the Institute of Brewinghttps://jib.cibd.org.uk/index.php/jib/article/view/98Carbonation of beer in microbreweries using a bulk gas-to-atomised liquid (BGAL) approach2026-07-20T16:36:09+00:00Alexandra Jeananbarron@iastate.eduJordan Funkhouserjfunk@iastate.eduAndrew Makowskdrewmak@iastate.eduStacy Groenesgroene@iastate.eduRobert Brownrcbrown3@iastate.edu<p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>Why was the work done: </strong></span>In microbreweries, forced carbonation in a bright beer tank using a carbonation stone may require up to 72 hours to reach specification for dissolved carbon dioxide. The mass transfer kinetics in bubbled systems are generally poor due to the small surface area-to-volume ratio in the liquid phase. Alternatively, droplets of beer have a comparatively large surface area-to-volume ratio and can absorb gas at greater rates.</p> <p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>How was the work done:</strong></span> A bulk gas-to-atomised liquid (BGAL) process was evaluated for beer carbonation. Using this method, a spray of beer droplets is carbonated in a closed vessel pressurised with carbon dioxide gas and equipped with a nozzle to atomise the beer. Following testing at prototype scale (3 x 19 L), the approach was evaluated at a pilot scale by retrofitting a 240 L bright beer tank to accommodate a nozzle, and a laboratory brewed IPA was carbonated at a rate of 3.0 L/min.</p> <p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>What are the main findings: </strong></span>The rate of carbonation achieved by the BGAL system was between 3 and 50 times greater than conventional carbonation, the precise improvement was dependent upon the operating conditions for the conventional method. Further, analysis of the finished beer revealed that hop oil compounds in BGAL carbonated beer were statistically similar to the concentration in beer carbonated by conventional means.</p> <p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>Why is the work important: </strong></span>These results suggest that the BGAL system could enhance the carbonation step in microbreweries that use a carbonation stone in bright beer tank, while maintaining the aromatic characteristics of the beer.</p>2026-07-20T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of the Institute of Brewinghttps://jib.cibd.org.uk/index.php/jib/article/view/97Quantifying the impact of increasing wash strength for Scotch malt whisky production: a modelling study2026-05-28T12:12:08+00:00Shiwen ZhuangS.Zhuang@hw.ac.ukJane WhiteJ.White@hw.ac.ukChris Boultonchristopherboulton@gmail.com<p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>Why was the work done:</strong></span> High gravity fermentation (<span class="s2"><em>ca</em></span> 8% ABV) is used in the production of Scotch malt whisky but the impact of increasing wash strength on fermentation and distilling has not been quantified, especially in relation to environmental and operational performance.</p> <p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>How was the work done:</strong></span> A representative scenario of a 200 hL wash at 8% ABV was used to model wash strengths of 10-14% ABV under two conditions: the same wash volume (<span class="s2"><em>Condition 1</em></span>) and the same ethanol mass (<span class="s2"><em>Condition 2</em></span>). All scenarios were assessed quantitatively.</p> <p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>What are the main findings</strong></span>: In <span class="s2"><em>Condition 1</em></span>, increasing wash strength enhanced batch production capacity but may require a larger spirit still or multiple distillation batches. In <span class="s2"><em>Condition 2</em></span>, higher wash strength reduced batch processing volumes, enabling the use of smaller vessels without compromising the capacity for ethanol production. Distilling energy dominated the total energy demand, whereas fermenter cooling energy was negligible. On the basis of a litre of pure alcohol (100% ABV) and an annual target basis, increasing wash strength from 8 to 14% ABV progressively reduced energy use and carbon footprint by 15.8-16.1%, while also reducing post-distillation discharge volumes by 55.0% in pot ale and 30.4% in spent lees.</p> <p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>Why is the work important:</strong></span> This study provides quantitative evidence of the effects of increasing wash strength (8-14% ABV) on the operational and environmental performance in Scotch malt whisky production. This supports process innovation, capacity planning, and industrial decarbonisation strategies.</p>2026-07-22T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of the Institute of Brewinghttps://jib.cibd.org.uk/index.php/jib/article/view/99Unravelling the art of feints recycling for whisky: a production survey2026-06-29T16:23:14+00:00Matt Stricklandms4040@hw.ac.ukDawn MaskellD.L.Maskell@hw.ac.uk<p class="p2"><span class="s2"><strong>Why the work was done: </strong></span>Batch distillation is used globally to produce a number of different categories of spirit using a variety of methodologies. This work aims to gain a better understanding of the current institutional knowledge on batch distillation techniques for the various categories of whisky, including the recycling and processing of 'final runnings' or the 'tails' fraction.</p> <p class="p2"><span class="s2"><strong>How the work was done: </strong></span>A survey was designed to gain insight into current distilling knowledge and practice. Sixty distillers from eight countries respnded to the survey and reported their distillation practices with particular emphasis on how decisions are made regarding where the individual liquid fractions begin and end during distillation and how the feints ('heads' + tails') are subsequently handled.</p> <p class="p2"><span class="s2"><strong>What are the main findings: </strong></span>Of the 60 distillers surveyed, 59 responded that they recycled feints in some way and 93.2% of those respondents noted that the feints did appear to stabilise after a few distillation cycles. The majority (75%) noted that there is a cost benefit to recycling feints and 61.7% also felt that feints recycling improved the character of the overall spirit.</p> <p class="p3"><span class="s2"><strong>Why is the work important: </strong></span>Despite the prevalence of recycling feints, little is understood about how this process affects spirit character or why the phenomenon of stabilisation occurs. This and further research, will provide distillers with better insight into their practices and offer tools for continued improvement in spirit quality.</p>2026-07-22T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of the Institute of Brewinghttps://jib.cibd.org.uk/index.php/jib/article/view/100Isolation from grain based starter and fermentation performance of high aroma strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Korean rice wine2026-07-21T16:36:59+00:00Miri Parkmiripark@lotte.netAreum Leeareum_lee@lotte.netEunju Leelee-eunju@lotte.netJeongwon Kimjeongwon-kim@lotte.netYujeong Kimkim.yujeong@lotte.netSung Han Kimsunghankim@lotte.netHusung Shimshimhs@lotte.netSeokmin Yoonseokminyoon@lotte.net<p class="p2"><span class="s2"><strong>Why was the work done: </strong></span>The quality and sensory differentiation of Cheongju rice wine require the selection of yeast strains that combine stable fermentation performance with desirable aroma profiles. However, indigenous yeasts from traditional fermentation starters have received little attention or comparative evaluation under standardised Cheongju fermentation conditions.</p> <p class="p3"><span class="s3"><strong>How was the work done: </strong></span>Strains of <span class="s3"><em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae </em></span>were isolated from traditional Nuruk used in Cheongju production and screened using glucose and ethanol tolerance. Two selected strains were evaluated through seed (500 mL) and 5 L fermentations, with analysis of alcohol production, volatile aroma compounds, taste attributes, and enzymatic activity profiles. These were compared with a commercial reference strain of <span class="s3"><em>S. cerevisiae</em></span>.</p> <p class="p2"><span class="s2"><strong>What are the main findings: </strong></span>The yeasts exhibited stable fermentation performance, producing alcohol concentrations of 17-19% (w/v). Cheongju fermented with these strains showed an enrichment of fruity ethyl ester compounds, with no differences in acetate ester formation. Taste analysis using an ‘electronic tongue’ showed reduced bitterness and a modest increase in umami-related attributes. Further, the strains had higher esterase and esterase-lipase activities than the reference strain.</p> <p class="p4"><span class="s2"><strong>Why is the work important: </strong></span>These findings highlight the potential of indigenous yeast strains to enhance aroma quality and sensory balance in Cheongju fermentation. The results provide a practical basis for yeast selection in rice wine brewing and support the development of optimised fermentation strategies for Cheongju production.</p>2026-07-22T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of the Institute of Brewing